The girl with the complexes being much more attractive and seductive than "the girl without complexes". Why?
Because it relates to sex is serious, because sex is not just gymnastics. Sex for her is overcoming this event. Sex is 90% is psychology, not physiology, and means, "the girl with complexes" is not a diagnosis, this sexy pose. This intellectual posture, valuable intellectual posture, which built the aesthetics of a huge number of works of art. The price of this pose is great - because it must be natural, it must be at the level of instincts, on a personal level, is not given just by request.
When you have a girl, I want to have it all, here and now, I want to feel that she really feels that her "have". It's nice. It excites. If not resent me feminists, but "the girl without complexes" - being sterile and boring as pornography, a la "Playboy". Woman no complexes is not a woman, it is a gymnastic trainer. The widespread appeal of men to bi-/homosexual experience due to the fact that women, on which worked the sexual revolution, have ceased to perceive sex seriously. Men have to look for a serious sex elsewhere: male complexes in relation to sex with a man were more durable, man-straight still afraid of sex more than anything. When it is impossible to seduce a girl (because he has not left the girls who can "seduce"), you have to seduce men. When we don't have any virgins girls, you have to look for "virgin"-boy.
Sexual complexes is the Foundation of those sexy poses that I call "intelligent". Almost every intellectual posture based on explicit or implicit sexual taboos. For example, "sex with a nun," or "sex with Komsomolskaya Pravda" has the charm only when this nun and the KP inside something different from prostitutes. It knew the Marquis de Sade and other gallant Lord of the eighteenth century. Hence, complexes and taboos are necessary, they are necessary as air. They need to come up with, they need to be taken to the masses". Christianity is not called "the religion of love," as no other religion, it was concerned about sexual taboos, it was carefully monitor the quality and safety of intelligent POS.
Oddly enough, it turns out that the sexual revolution and traditional morality are actually not contradictory to each other. The coincidence here is not only external but also internal, because the new freedom of sex makes it entirely spiritual phenomenon. The first sexual revolution liberated in sex, the body, removed the shackles only then to throw out during the second revolution. Today the area of sexual experimentation of the sphere is trivial physiological "perversions" moved to sky-high intellectual sex. In the foreground is not the sexual norm, and struggle with your own consciousness, too stupid, too flat, too one-dimensional to accommodate unlimited horizons of new features.
Both they and the sexual revolution, and traditional morality in its strive for the revival of spirituality in sex. They both want to make sex a reasonable, clean, high. They both look at the normal, biological sex only as a vague, imperfect, vague semblance of what should be. And by the way, the most promising second sexual revolution in those countries, which the first revolution touched the least. In these countries, still the attitude towards sex as a spiritual phenomenon. Conversely, those countries where, in relation to sex too entrenched rhetoric of "overcoming", "exemption", "removing barriers", are doomed to eternal cycle in the field trivial.
Behind this rhetoric overcome is the vague hope that removing barriers and breaking taboos, returning the person to the most primitive layers of the psyche, we supposedly reveals something significant and important, for the sake of what these barriers need to be overcome. They forget one obvious thing: freedom, i.e. the variety of opportunities that comes along with the complication of the rules of the game, and not with their simplification. The rules of the game invented not to hinder and embarrass, and in order to make the game more varied, and Vice versa, the violation of the rules makes the game a primitive and boring. The rules of the game keep the game - they create it. If you cancel rules, any sport will be reduced to Boxing or wrestling, and from any game, if you simplify it to the limit, will remain only "Chinese draw".
The rules of the game - it's part of the game, they ask a variety of possibilities and combinations faced by partners. Setting the boundaries of our actions on a trivial level, they force us to use more complex and interesting opportunities. They allow the natural energy of the sex of the plane trivial to redirect in the third dimension, to allow her to build a complex vertical structure. The classic example of this process is a birth in the South of France, during the middle ages, the rituals of courtly love, which ever since has remained the benchmark. Medieval Provencal knights managed trivial adultery, adultery, to turn into a real ritual, with many rules, restrictions and conventions. They managed to open a whole hitherto existing human feelings and emotions.
This is the General law: the better thought out system of rules, the more interesting the game is, the farther it is from the routine and trivial. And sexual complexes is that which is born of the rules of the game, that protects them and protects. That is why they are so important. Whole generations of our ancestors worked hard to instill in women the complexes, modesty, chastity. They created religion, built churches, monasteries, was invented all the commandments and moral codes, because they knew the sex, they knew what I wanted. And now, today everywhere in the world again conservative turn. Today people remember about God, destroy churches, organize demonstrations against immoral films, blamed "this pollution young people," they want to return their taboos, want to protect the intellectual posture, accustomed. This conservative turn should not cause us fear - we know that beyond the sex, he will not go. The coming sexual revolution is conservative revolution, " if you want, it's a counterrevolution. It goes hand in hand with the revival of morality, ethics, good old values, she takes them by the hand and drags her to bed.
Source:
Sex-log
No comments:
Post a Comment