Needless to procreate poverty

Position "where am I supposed to give birth to a second child, it's not only to give birth, it still need to feed" - probably the most common among today's "one-child" mom.


To explain the unwillingness to bear children to the financial problem has become a common practice.




And ended it all firmly entrenched in our language the words "nothing to produce poverty".





To bear children - need.


You can, of course, on this occasion to debate, but in this case we go against nature and human destiny, and this passion as I would not like. To give birth is necessary.




Should bear more than one - this seems to be also quite indisputable truth.




First, you cannot deny your own child's brothers or sisters (who do not know - this is a very special spiritual community consanguineous relatives, amazing and unique).




Secondly, one child grow bored and pedagogically unsafe, there are all sorts of distortions in personality development.




Thirdly, the more children, the happier parent adulthood and old age (with proper upbringing, of course).




Fourthly, there are, in the end, some of the specific obligations of the person before evolution.




If we assembled two by two, will leave only one, soon mankind will become extinct - who is good at math, can even understand terms.




And indeed, many children - it's great. Even better than a lot of friends.





And now, about the poverty.


Yes, children need financial costs.




It is generally accepted that large.




Such that the two healthy and intelligent man is simply unable to provide.




And if not for a small salary, outstanding housing, lack of assistance from the state and other material reasons, we would give birth.




And if there is no money - and to give birth will not.




It seems to me, children, your money is not really needed.




That is not the first and not so much:




"well, don't you buy them a new perambulator;


- do not subject the house newfangled food-singing toys;


- do not give my cell phone, digital camera, ;


- new car and an apartment for a wedding -




is that a reason not to give life to the whole person?




Yes it will grow well in a second-hand stroller for your friends, great will play in your children's blocks, popolnoma simple-simple mobilnika and the car will buy on their own, hard earned.




I think that financial issues can be solved.




To increase revenue and reduce costs. It would wish.




And about poverty, we cover his unwillingness to strain.




Of course, the child - it's the sleepless nights, the constant responsibility, educational stress, self-development and self-control.




That's what prevents us from having children, and not fear to rasplatit poverty.




So let's tell each other the truth. Suddenly, the lie will become uncomfortable. Here and demographic situation will improve.




In conclusion, I will explain why I consider myself entitled to competently on these topics to discuss.




When I became pregnant with a second child, I was making $ 100 a husband three times less, we lived in a hostel and just got a new promising position.




How many women in my case would make abortion? I, for example, it advised all without exception.




Today I career my happy: of course, had to submit to the Ordinance of man, to rent an apartment closer to work and run to feed the second daughter breastfeeding breaks.




Had to take a couple of part-time work and to reflect on the effectiveness: the higher it is, the more earnings.




Today my kids, of course, do not have anything they would like: cell phones without cameras, and one bike for two, and shoes Junior donative for the older, but this does not prevent them to be happy.




Ask brother. And we say ' no'.

Source:

Belarusian women's portal

women's web magazine