Neutrality at work: one's own position or its absence?

... Not concerned about office disassembly, they do not interfere in relations between colleagues, not trying to convince anyone of his innocence, blame nobody and do not protect the "tired" of the employee to the head.



The issue


When economists firms try to put such a plan, which will never perform and, consequently, no award will not receive. When "miss" the entire Department is trying to shove per employee, making it a "scapegoat", and slapped him off. When the question about downsizing... How to remain indifferent in such situations?..




If peaceful position the team is divided into groups just to walk together to dine, in acute situations, the division of the team into groups becomes much clearer.




Some (those who Pohrebea) go to the authorities to prove something, others (those who care) discuss the situation in the corners. And third... the Third pretend that around absolutely nothing happens. And discuss, but bought know for sure the boots, actually nothing...





With contempt


I never could understand how you can remain neutral, to stay away from problems because it means not to Express any point of view, " says Light. - When a person entirely by itself, works, no feeling and no one is supporting, I have it does not cause any feeling but contempt. Contempt for cowardice, for "own skin" the most important for him and he by and large don't care about what is not renegotiated in time the contracts are to blame for not only your overall colleagues Katya, but also the Manager, and Department head. And you know perfectly well that such people will never support and especially not going to stand for you.





"Neutrality retain only egoists"


I think that the neutrality retain only selfish people, not just not ready to help someone in a difficult situation, but from which we cannot expect even basic support, " said Ira. "I can never be. Probably, I still very vividly the sense of community. A former activist of the trade Union of workers of light industry, I still protect colleagues from his superiors.




Because differently I can not. I used to not be silent, if you see unfair treatment. Can't stay away. Although, however, understand that attitude towards me guide this is not getting better. By the way, this applies not only to work. I always intervene if you see that boy on the street beats the company. Say " call the police. I have this kind of attitude.




The neutrality is our weakness




- Neutrality - the weakness of the team, " says Tanya. Because if you argue with your boss is one person and the rest will remain in the party, the good of it will not. This "brave" will be fired or not to renew a contract with him. But if the leadership will go the entire Department, all will not be fired. This power to unite and to achieve justice.





For beginners and singles


In my opinion, neutrality at work retains only two categories of people. First, a novice. Their neutrality lasts a relatively short time, until the employee will not be determined with the range of communication in the team. After some time, the novice is adjacent to one of the established in the office of the groups. Secondly, neutrality keep people single.




They with anyone at work, not friends, so nobody really sympathize and not sympathy. The lack of data of the senses leads to the fact that the lone no pronounced needs someone to protect, someone to stand up... fortunately, people-individuals not so much.




Best position




And in my opinion, to remain neutral and not interfere - it's the best position, " says Lena. - First, "justice" is always in someone's interests.




Often it comes down to the showdown due to the redistribution of responsibilities. Some go to the guide, complaining that they have a lot of work, and ask for the part to pass on to others. Following them to the head are those who try to shift part of the work, accusing the first, that they say, just do nothing.




Secondly, if very closely adjacent to one of the parties, to work just once. All around are busy nursing bones to each other and indiscriminate surveillance: who what to whom about whom he said. Thirdly, the need to constantly delve into someone's problems is very tiring. Work is not a circle on interests and not meeting the analyst to constantly someone to comfort. In the end, if the employee's something very not happy, nobody is holding. You need to look for another job, where "smaller Pets, gossip, and intrigue."





The shadow people


"We have such a Lady-Neutrality, " says Violetta. - Katya seemed not to notice anything happening around. The work she does quietly, without unnecessary emotions. And to discuss personal matters on the phone, always goes far beyond the office.




On the other hand, we, other colleagues, too, don't see it. What is Kate in the office, that it is not all the same. We strongly believe that even if accidentally "lapnet" something "subversive" in her presence, to tell Kate will still be no, because it is no one communicates.




How to treat people-the shadows? With understanding, contempt or indifference? In the end, what's the difference?.. I only would you not be applied to them...

Author:

Tomovska M


Source:

MyJane

women's web magazine